<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Consumer is King &#187; Consumer Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://consumer-king.com/tag/consumer-forum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://consumer-king.com</link>
	<description>Articles and stories about consumer rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 09:52:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9969</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interior design forced to pay Rs 1 lakh penalty for not completing the work promised, forcing the hiring of another firm</title>
		<link>http://consumer-king.com/2010/04/09/interior-design-forced-to-pay-rs-1-lakh-penalty-for-not-completing-the-work-promised-forcing-the-hiring-of-another-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://consumer-king.com/2010/04/09/interior-design-forced-to-pay-rs-1-lakh-penalty-for-not-completing-the-work-promised-forcing-the-hiring-of-another-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extra Charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interior Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consumer-king.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you are setting up a new shop or a new business with clients / consumers coming to visit the office or location, there is a need to ensure that the place is attractive and gives a good appearance. Getting the design to be attractive is very important, and it is equally important that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you are setting up a new shop or a new business with clients / consumers coming to visit the office or location, there is a need to ensure that the place is attractive and gives a good appearance. Getting the design to be attractive is very important, and it is equally important that the work to make the place attractive is done in time and as part of a integrated project. So, it is essential that whoever is charged with doing the interior design and re-structuring of an office or shop gets the work done in time, and to your satisfaction. So what happens when this work does not happen in time, or the firm doing this delays the work and finally gives up ? You will need to re-plan your schedule, and hire somebody else to get the work done, resulting in a lot of mental aggravation and agony; one client took this to the consumer forum and got compensation (<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Delaying-work-costs-interior-design-firm-Rs-1L/articleshow/5758734.cms" target="_blank">link to article</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>
The Mumbai Suburban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum this week ordered an architecture and interior designing firm to pay Rs 1 lakh to a shop owner for not executing work on time. Bhasin said after that she engaged S R Choudhary, a consulting architect, to assess the quality and quantum of work executed by the firm as well as the losses it caused her. In her complaint, she sought compensation for the losses and also demanded that the interior designers should pay her the money she had to give the other architect firm to complete the work.<br />
<span id="more-195"></span><br />
Gurdeep Komalan and Associates argued that the delay was caused among other things, by “Bhasin’s unclear mind and her constant interference’’. They also blamed the weather, including the 26/7 flood for it, and denied that the architect, Sunil Komalan, would stay away and not supervise the work. However, the forum presided by J L Deshpande said there was no evidence that the plan was ever changed at the insistence of Bhasin, which pushed back the deadline.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This also means that whenever you have an interaction with an external firm, make sure that all status and changes are properly reserved and recorded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumer-king.com/2010/04/09/interior-design-forced-to-pay-rs-1-lakh-penalty-for-not-completing-the-work-promised-forcing-the-hiring-of-another-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurance company forced to provide insurance even when the disease was within a year of the policy (exclusion cause)</title>
		<link>http://consumer-king.com/2010/04/07/insurance-company-forced-to-provide-insurance-even-when-the-disease-was-within-a-year-of-the-policy-exclusion-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://consumer-king.com/2010/04/07/insurance-company-forced-to-provide-insurance-even-when-the-disease-was-within-a-year-of-the-policy-exclusion-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consumer-king.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many times have you seen that the insurance policy by an insurance company comes with certain conditions, mentioned in the small print. These are various sections that the insurance company will not cover, including when the person is indulging in adventure sports, goes in for risky activities, or in the case of life insurance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times have you seen that the insurance policy by an insurance company comes with certain conditions, mentioned in the small print. These are various sections that the insurance company will not cover, including when the person is indulging in adventure sports, goes in for risky activities, or in the case of life insurance policies, if the death is due to suicide or in mob action, or similar stuff. For medical policies, it is fairly common that many diseases are not covered in the first year of the policy, which is normally standard policy by the insurance company to cover themselves from people who know that they will need medical treatment soon, and thus want to go in for a policy to cover these costs. However, the insurance companies normally do not mention such exclusions prominently enough for people to understand and realize the impact of such exclusions. Now a state consumer forum has ruled that this clause was not valid since the consumer was not adequately informed of this exclusion (<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Consumer-court-orders-insurance-co-to-pay-mediclaim/articleshow/5752728.cms" target="_blank">link to article</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>
The state consumer commission has directed an insurance company to pay medical expenses incurred by a patient within a year of taking a mediclaim policy even though the exclusion clause stated otherwise. The commission noted the insurance company was guilty of not bringing the exclusion clause to the notice of the policy holder while issuing the policy.<br />
After his mediclaim was rejected by the company, the policyholder, Sushil Kumar, approached the Delhi district forum which directed it to pay Rs 1 lakh towards insured amount besides Rs 10,000 as compensation.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumer-king.com/2010/04/07/insurance-company-forced-to-provide-insurance-even-when-the-disease-was-within-a-year-of-the-policy-exclusion-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank fined for losing the property papers of a consumer, decision by National Consumer Forum</title>
		<link>http://consumer-king.com/2010/04/03/bank-fined-for-losing-the-property-papers-of-a-consumer-decision-by-nationa-consumer-forum/</link>
		<comments>http://consumer-king.com/2010/04/03/bank-fined-for-losing-the-property-papers-of-a-consumer-decision-by-nationa-consumer-forum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sale Deeds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consumer-king.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you take a loan from a bank or a financial institution for the purpose of a house or a loan, the bank or institution would want to ensure that its ownership is retained till you pay off the loan fully. So, if you have taken a car loan, the RC papers says that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you take a loan from a bank or a financial institution for the purpose of a house or a loan, the bank or institution would want to ensure that its ownership is retained till you pay off the loan fully. So, if you have taken a car loan, the RC papers says that the bank actually owns the vehicle, and once you are done with the loan, the bank will give you papers that will allow you to claim the registration back in your name. However, in the case of a loan for property, the bank may want to retain the original papers in its control until the loan is paid. In the case of these papers, these are official Government papers that are difficult to get a new copy made if they get lost for some reason. So what happens when you give these papers to the bank or financial institution and they lose these papers, and then deny that they ever had these papers ? Well, you better be sure that you have a receipt from the bank that they kept these papers, and then go to the consumer court to get back your rights (<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Bank-ordered-to-pay-man-Rs-25K-for-lost-flat-papers/articleshow/5729679.cms" target="_blank">link to article</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>
The callousness of a nationalised bank in preserving the sale deed of a flat has cost the bank Rs 25,000. In a landmark order, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) directed Bank of Baroda to pay the amount to a Navi Mumbai resident for misplacing the original sale deed of his apartment. Janardhan B Kotian had given the sale deed of his Vashi apartment to Bank of Baroda while procuring the housing loan. &#8220;Being an employee of Bank of Baroda, I had applied for a housing loan from my bank itself to buy a Cidco plot. The bank agreed to give housing loan of Rs 2.35 lakh and I raised a loan of Rs 85,000 from HDFC Bank,&#8221; Kotian said.<br />
&#8220;In November 2000, I wanted to sell the flat. I approached the bank and paid the entire loan amount with interest. I requested the bank to return the original sale deed but the bank said it was not traceable,&#8221; Kotian said. He said that though the bank said that they would give an NoC to CIDCO to go ahead with the sale transaction, he did not accept this as the prospective buyer was not inclined to purchase the flat. &#8220;I had to refund the advance of Rs 2.5 lakh I had taken from the prospective purchaser and even forced to take some money from a financier at 2% interest to pay him back the amount,&#8221; Kotian said.
</p></blockquote>
<p>In this case, what makes it even worse was that the person worked at the same bank; so consider what happened in those cases where the person was just a regular customer of the bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumer-king.com/2010/04/03/bank-fined-for-losing-the-property-papers-of-a-consumer-decision-by-nationa-consumer-forum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paying compensation to a person after getting dead insects in a cake</title>
		<link>http://consumer-king.com/2010/03/20/paying-compensation-to-a-person-after-getting-dead-insects-in-a-cake/</link>
		<comments>http://consumer-king.com/2010/03/20/paying-compensation-to-a-person-after-getting-dead-insects-in-a-cake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adulteration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consumer-king.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Food and drinks are something that a person takes inside their body, and their is an expectation that anything you consume will be free of any adulteration, or any foreign substance that can cause harm. Makers of food and beverages can face penalties if it gets proven that their items contain any substance that can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Food and drinks are something that a person takes inside their body, and their is an expectation that anything you consume will be free of any adulteration, or any foreign substance that can cause harm. Makers of food and beverages can face penalties if it gets proven that their items contain any substance that can cause harm. So what happens when a person buys a cake to enjoy the pleasure, and then finds that the cake contains something that can alarm any human being, dead insects. If it were to happen to you, what would you do ? You would be shocked, you would complain to the manufacturer of the item about the adulteration, and want compensation. And if the food item was something that children were to consume such as cakes, the anger would turn much more vehement and sharper. Further, if the manufacturer of the item refused to accept the complaint and claimed that you were committing fraud, what would you do ? You would go through the process of getting the item tested independently, and also file a complaint in a consumer forum (<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/Dead-insect-in-cake-costs-store-Rs-5000/articleshow/5699818.cms" target="_blank">link to article</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>
Irked on seeing dead insects in a cake purchased by him, forced a DSP-rank official of Punjab to knock on the door&#8217;s of the consumer forum.  In his complaint, Singal, a resident of Rupnagar, stated that he purchased a fruit cake worth Rs 40 along with other food items on September 18, 2009.<br />
He alleged that he found a dead insect inside the cake and following this, a day later, he lodged a complaint at Sector 36 police station as well as with director, health services, UT. Singal also deposited the cake for laboratory examination and it was sent to the public analyst, Punjab, from where it was reported that the contents of the sample contained five dead insects and hence, it was adulterated. Alleging deficiency in service, Singal filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The above example is a fine way of demonstrating the correct way of filing a complaint, and getting the required scientific evidence to back up your complaint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumer-king.com/2010/03/20/paying-compensation-to-a-person-after-getting-dead-insects-in-a-cake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
